MANILA, Philippines — Pointing to a sudden retreat from official oversight, a prominent member of the House prosecution panel has directly attacked the credibility of a highly publicized whistleblower group. Bicol Saro party-list Rep. Terry Ridon declared that the decision of 18 former bodyguards to skip a formal Senate inquiry severely damages the validity of their high-profile corruption allegations.
The text frames the group’s absence as an deliberate attempt to hide from official cross-examination, adding a highly volatile layer to a larger political struggle connected to Vice President Sara Duterte’s imminent impeachment trial.
The high-stakes political standoff centers on the group’s sudden refusal to step forward and repeat their testimony under a newly restructured Senate leadership:
[ THE CONGRESSIONAL SUBPOENA PARADIGM ]
│
┌───────────────────────────────┴───────────────────────────────┐
▼ ▼
[ THE SENSATIONALIZED FORUM ] [ THE LEGISLATIVE RETREAT ]
• **The Thursday Hearing:** Last week, the 18 bodyguards—often • **The Monday Snub:** When officially summoned on June 8 by the
called the "18 Maleta Boys"—testified before a Senate faction • newly recognized Blue Ribbon Committee chair, Sen. Erwin Tulfo,
led by former Senate President Alan Peter Cayetano. • the group refused to appear on the floor.
• **The Suitcase Claims:** They reiterated allegations from a • **The Hideout:** Accompanied by lawyer Levi Baligod, the 18
February affidavit, claiming former Rep. Elizaldy Co ordered • witnesses physically arrived at the Senate complex but chose to
them to hand over cash-filled suitcases to House lawmakers. • stay locked inside the private office of Sen. Robinhood Padilla.
Rep. Terry Ridon—who was personally added to the bagmen’s target list after being elected to the 11-member House impeachment prosecution team on May 12—dismissed the entire event as a coordinated distraction strategy:
[ THE IMPEACHMENT COUNTER-STRATEGY ] │ ▼[ The Refusal Gap ] ──► Ridon argued that if the bodyguards' stories were authentic, they should have had no problem testifying under oath and facing questioning by the full Senate. │ ▼[ Credibility Dent ] ──► *“They were willing to make sensational allegations in an informal forum, but were unwilling to repeat those same allegations under oath... Their refusal seriously undermines their claims.”* │ ▼[ Impeachment Lock ] ──► The prosecution panel clarified that they remain completely focused on the July 6 trial, unfazed by what they brand as "manufactured sideshows" meant to protect the Vice President.
As the political row deepens over control of the Senate floor, independent federal enforcement agencies are stepping in to enforce strict investigative protocols before opening official probes.
| Investigating State Agency | Required Evidentiary Baseline | Core Investigatory Assessment Findings |
| National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) | Requires 18 distinct, individual affidavits detailing specific transactions. | Noted that group affidavits are legally weak because not every bodyguard participated in the exact same delivery runs. |
| Office of the Ombudsman | Mandates specific, verifiable individual claims free of evolving geographic locations. | Expressed willingness to review the cash-kickback allegations but will not move forward without personalized, sworn testimonies. |
| Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) | Enforcing strict media terminology guidelines to protect the reputation of the military. | Clarified that using the term “ex-Marines” is highly misleading, as four were never in the service and the majority were dishonorably discharged years ago. |
“Their decision to testify should not depend on the advice, instruction, or preference of any single senator. It should depend on what their supposed whistleblower story was all about: truth-telling, accountability, and a willingness to stand by serious allegations under oath,” Ridon concluded, pointing out that the witnesses’ shifting accounts—such as changing the alleged drop-off locations from the Batasang Pambansa complex to private townhouses—further dismantle their case.
The ongoing controversy surrounding the “18 Maleta Boys” highlights the intense political maneuvering ahead of the Vice President’s July impeachment trial. While supporters of the whistleblowers view their testimony as a critical look into public works corruption, the House prosecution panel sees it as a coordinated attempt to damage their character and stall the legal process. By refusing to face Senator Erwin Tulfo’s organized panel, the witnesses have inadvertently allowed critics like Ridon to challenge the legitimacy of their claims. As the NBI and the Ombudsman hold firm on requiring individualized affidavits before launching a full investigation, the controversial case appears to be losing momentum, leaving the public to question whether these serious allegations are built on actual truth or political theater.